|
|
Post by karlsie on Jun 11, 2009 16:21:48 GMT -5
Tom, when i say, "we the people", i mean all the people of the world who are tired of submission, repression laboring for the dreams of others, when the dreams are not theirs, and the fruits of their hard work is taken from their hands. Statutory rape is a rape of deceit; the victim not understanding the consequences of the agreement. It is a rape of the innocents, for which they cannot be held at fault. What has been defiled has been raped. Our land, our water, our people have been defiled on a global scale. Our problems are shared problems and link back to the same source. We all have the right to challenge this source no matter where the jurisdiction is of our country's constitution. Strength is in unity. Separationism weakens the individual statement of rights. My feet, as always, remain firmly upon the ground. If you don't feel we've been duped and deceived through statutory rape, then you are into denial or welcomed the tangle. Notice, i used past tense. The act is accomplished. We stand up and fight or continue rolling in the hay.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Littlechief on Jun 11, 2009 21:08:12 GMT -5
Nicely stated, karlsie. I knew if I was controversial with you on this subject, that your shining values would push their way through. Made you think though. I agree about you statement of we the people being on a global scale. However I do not have the energy or force of strength to save every person on the planet. Although I do have significant knowledge and will to protect what is mine, including those I love and hold near, the key is community first then Country. When I say We the People, I mean the pre-amble for the Supreme Constitution circa 1778. And if I happen to help influence a Country, in particular the one of my birth and origin, while trying to protect and serve my community, so much the better. Yes, I am highly controversial; it is my way of pleading for help to save us all. I may not know you, but I will protect and serve you for the asking, to the best of my abillity. To promise more would be to begin to grand stand. My "Subversify wife" is the one who does that for the Family and World at large, not for me though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Littlechief on Jun 11, 2009 21:15:52 GMT -5
I may not bend knee to anyone, but that is because when you/I weild the sword of justice in protection of everything right and just, you can not show the weakness of your neck.
|
|
|
|
Post by neonorth on Jun 12, 2009 13:02:45 GMT -5
Just for the record, we are no longer under the Queen's rule, as of 1981 Canada instituted its own constitution though we retained the Queen as our 'figurehead', as for the rest of the discussion I'll have to digest it some more before entering the fray....it's rodeo week here so between the bullshit of the schoolboards association and the teacher's union bullshit I am having to contend with the fact that I have cow shit in my hair...not that I'm complaining, it's just nice that for at least one time of the year I'm not looked at strangely for having so.....
|
|
|
|
Post by karlsie on Jun 12, 2009 17:49:40 GMT -5
Tony, you seemed to have a little difficulty imagining a group of people who come over to the house to pound about common law all day. Now, you know that it's true. I challenged the gang to write a few of their own articles since they were always advising me as to what i should write. Tom has accepted the challenge as he has a very articulate hand and wishes to elaborate on it. One good thing about rodeo bulls; they don't try to cover up their shit and pretend its a bed of roses.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Littlechief on Jun 12, 2009 21:59:11 GMT -5
Just for the record, we are no longer under the Queen's rule, as of 1981 Canada instituted its own constitution though we retained the Queen as our 'figurehead', as for the rest of the discussion I'll have to digest it some more before entering the fray....it's rodeo week here so between the bullshit of the schoolboards association and the teacher's union bullshit I am having to contend with the fact that I have cow shit in my hair...not that I'm complaining, it's just nice that for at least one time of the year I'm not looked at strangely for having so..... Sorry neonorth, my mistake. Yea vearily the Queen and the rest of English HRH are now figureheads, just as they are in England. However I believe that Canadian law now mirrors English Parlimentary law? It's still Statutory. |
|
|
|
Post by neonorth on Jun 12, 2009 22:45:41 GMT -5
Yea verily so we do emulate the British system; we have an elected “House of Commons” just as in the British system but rather than calling the next level “the House of Lords”, it is called the Senate – though just like the House of Lords it is an appointed seat. The Senate doesn’t do much, depending on which party resides in power (for instance, if there are more Conservative seats in the house of commons while there are more Liberal senators, there tends to be more ‘discussion’ in the senate). A major difference is that unlike the British system where the different British ‘states’ have different representation, Canada has six basic parties – Conservative, Liberal, New Democrat, Bloc Quebecois (which interestingly enough though a party in the federal system is only representing the people of Quebec. It is considered a separatist party as it supports the provincial Parti Quebecois in that party’s goal of officially separating from Canada and being recognized as a nation – while retaining the Canadian dollar as their currency and the transfer payment monies. Even odder yet is that the Native bands that make up half of the province of Quebec have said that they will not be part of a separate Quebec and that the treaties with them are with Canada not the province of Quebec. The Quebec government has said that they don’t recognize the argument of the Native bands – how’s that for fucked up politics), the Green party (aka eco-nut jobs) and the occasional independent seat. There used to be a seventh – the Reform Party, which had been made up mostly of Albertan candidates, which was considered the ultra- conservatives. They have since been absorbed into the Progressive Conservative banner because they realized that they were dividing the conservative vote. Our current Prime Minister, Steven Harper sprung from the Reform party; which is the reason that he is not seen in a particularly good light by the majority of Eastern Canadians.
|
|
