|
|
Post by neonorth on Jun 14, 2009 8:49:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by neonorth on Jun 14, 2009 8:53:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by neonorth on Jun 14, 2009 9:04:27 GMT -5
By the way, the jokes got steadily worse as last week progressed - I even did a cartoon strip on a waitress confusing wine being served at room temperature with womb temperature. I'm attempting to have Dr. Phal talk about the educational system but it seems that all the representatives keep on turning up looking like Mao, Stalin, Hitler and Ron L Hubbard - I just think that its totally unfair to these people's legacies to be compared to the Teachers Union and school board association.
I'm rambling quite a bit today, sorry about that, but what I'm really perplexed about that some of the individual teachers I've talked to in the province don't agree with the Teachers Union that giving parents the right to pull students out is wrong but they have to tow the party line or risk censure. What kind of friggin' system is that? In a way I hope that the college pulls my credentials for Early Childhood Education and Educational Assistant for whatever reason they'll make up to punish me for talking against their plans for holding Alberta's children for ransom- I'm not using them and quite frankly its a black mark on my character to being even considered one of them..
|
|
|
|
Post by karlsie on Jun 14, 2009 16:03:44 GMT -5
Dr. Phal is quite the Sherlock Holmes! The things you can learn by the way a woman eats a banana! I always break off a piece and give it to my ferret before finishing the rest. I'm afraid to ask the significance of this. I've got a feeling i don't want to know.
I've actually been thinking a lot on gun law legislation recently, without a great many conclusions. One of my biggest difficulties is in the differences in rural attitudes about guns versus the urban reality. Guns are a tool. Guns are for hunting. I don't know a very large number of people that feel they need a gun to protect themselves, although i know the attitude is different in more congested areas. I know a lot of people who believe that guns are needed to prevent the complete militarization of America. Even during my teenage years, the issue of the right to bear arms was discussed in the classroom. The lessons taught to me was that this right was a Constitutional safe guard in the event that the government strayed so far from the values of individual liberties, an armed force was needed to take back the freedoms our fore-fathers had so diligently sought to preserve for us. This necessity of rights is one of the main calling cards of the National Rifle Association. I don't own a gun. Since i don't hunt, i never felt a necessity to own one, but i continue to weigh the consequences of stricter gun laws and haven't come up with any good answers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Littlechief on Jun 14, 2009 16:43:12 GMT -5
The "American" second Amendment was put into place so as "We the People" would be able to form a militia to protect the "God and Country" concept. Many government officials say that with the United States military in place, the ability to form a militia is not needed, I however say that the active prescience of a Federal military is the basis to continue to maintain the ability to form said militia.
The Supreme Constitution was not formed to advise what Inborn Rights the Citizens of the Republic would have, but rather cement the boundaries for those whom would serve "Us" at the public level.
These boundaries are the declaration, under Constitution, for the People to have the ability change a grievious form of Government at Will.
However due to non-performance of specific duties of "We the People", there is now a Government in place that utilizes Statutory Fraud and censorship to cow the population en-mass.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Littlechief on Jun 14, 2009 16:58:32 GMT -5
It is my firm belief that the government’s extreme need to remove the arms from the population is the fore-runner to destroying International Borders and form the North American Block.
There is no other need or requirement for the Tri-Lateral Commission, who’s mission statement is to tear down the international boundaries of all countries.
What better way to destroy a border than to build a pipeline over it?
Obviously my "Subversify Wife" is involved, otherwise she would have pushed for the Internal state pipeline and sell all of the natural gas from port.
Come on people we have the LNG (liquid natural gas) technology required to export natural gas from port, and there is no other explanation to cross borders with a pipeline. If another Country does not have the technology to receive this LNG at port, then they must not be in need, or willing to meet the requirements of recievership for said fuels.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Littlechief on Jun 14, 2009 17:03:41 GMT -5
The next time a United States citizen is in a court of law for a statutory infraction, begin to demand that the Judge admit that the United States is bankrupt and owned by its creditors. This is part of having them prove Statutory Fraud by tone of their voice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ellgode on Nov 15, 2019 14:13:10 GMT -5
100 Mg Viagra Price Proscar Yahoo Propecia Viagra Professional Vs Regular Viagra generic cialis overnight delivery Cialis 20 Mg Preiswert Omnaris And Amoxicillin And Claritin D Vente Baclofen 10mg |
|
|
|
Post by Ellgode on Dec 1, 2019 9:05:48 GMT -5
Vardenafil Cheap cialis accutane 40 mg online Cialis 45 Ans |
|
