|
|
Post by The Late Mitchell Warren on Jan 23, 2009 17:28:39 GMT -5
I hated it. One of the worst things ever written. Now available for review. Bask in the unpublished story's awfulness.
|
|
|
|
Post by karlsie on Jan 23, 2009 18:10:45 GMT -5
I don't care how much you hated it. As usual, Mitchell's delivery includes a dry social commentary that is difficult to ignore. My complaint is, although i edited his work and i really want to see us rock and roll on the publishing, i don't know how to place his photo bucket image on the page. I'd like to see Stacy help out with this one, because it involves a different format than the one i've been using.
|
|
|
|
Post by grainnerhuad on Jan 27, 2009 13:51:18 GMT -5
Karla, I got the picture on and lost the body, so if we can work together to get the words and the picture up I think we can do it. I accidentally deleted what was in the cue though...sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by karlsie on Jan 27, 2009 18:25:18 GMT -5
Mitch says he has a copy in his files so all is not lost. Don't feel bad. The first few times i experimented with the images, i nearly corrupted the entire program. Fortunately, i was experimenting with my own piece so losing it wasn't anymore than an aggravation. Stacy had to straighten out what i was doing wrong. I was attempting too large a size and had to cut back the parameters in order for the program to be able to deal with it. Now i pay much closer attention to all the specifications before publishing.
|
|
Maya
Regular Contributor 
Queen of the Damned
Posts: 542
|
Post by Maya on Jan 27, 2009 18:25:31 GMT -5
Snickering and snorting. Grainne deleted it. Frea king newbie. Ask me how many articles I published? Just ask?
|
|
|
|
Post by grainnerhuad on Jan 27, 2009 18:48:21 GMT -5
Ahhh, well the hazing was one of the perks I was looking forward to sooo....thanks gals! I notice the guys are strangely silent on this. They must be wise indeed to not participate in the hazing of a newly minted editorial G-dess! Okay, I will read what ever guide for idiots Stacy sends to us and hopefully I can keep these kinds of mistakes down to a minimum.
|
|
|
|
Post by TLMW on Jan 28, 2009 15:32:26 GMT -5
(cries)
|
|
|
|
Post by karlsie on Jan 28, 2009 18:41:46 GMT -5
Grainne, you better rush over here and give Mitch a big kiss. You hurt his feelings. And Maya, you'd better give him a kiss too just because you've been ignoring him lately.
|
|
Maya
Regular Contributor
Queen of the Damned
Posts: 542
|
Post by Maya on Jan 28, 2009 18:48:42 GMT -5
Ignoring Mitch? There was no article here. I am sorry. Muahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh......smooch, smooch, smooch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Subversify on Jan 29, 2009 13:47:00 GMT -5
Both artciles were actually in the database, I could see the code in th HTML portion despite the visual appearing blank. There appears to have been some stange form elements that were copied into the beginning of the code - not sure if it was XML or javascripting but when I removed that block of code, everything appeared just fine. Mitch, could you re-post the other artcile?
|
|
|
|
Post by karlsie on Jan 29, 2009 16:37:50 GMT -5
Mitch managed to get his Oscar Review up yesterday, along with a short story, which i see remains intact. The one thing we weren't able to figure out was how to keep the "featured" section from showing more than three headings. Each time one of us moved an article from feature, an older featured article appeared, keeping the featured listing in four blocks.
|
|
|
|
Post by grainnerhuad on Jan 29, 2009 18:23:36 GMT -5
Glady Kisses Mitch and I am also glad everything was found!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Subversify on Jan 30, 2009 11:26:30 GMT -5
You guys are killing me. I even made refererence to it in the pictures post. The category "featured" puts them on the feature bar. If you want to remove a feature, how would you guess one should go about doing this?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Late Mitchell Warren on Jan 30, 2009 14:56:33 GMT -5
well, i must say i feel better now! no need for more kisses, stacy...we are cool with a manly handshake.
|
|
